Live Demo: Keeping Legal AI Answers Consistent in Your Workflows & Chats

Legal requests come from every direction: a forwarded email, an intake form, a question typed into an AI tool. Too often they sit in a shared inbox until someone has time, get triaged by whoever opens them first, and are answered differently depending on who answers. This session shows how to end that, so every request is picked up, routed and answered the same way, with a clear record of how each decision was made.

Join this 30-minute live demo to see how your rules monitor and triage incoming legal requests, and how the same rules govern the answers your business gets in AI chats.

What you'll see

• Legal intake, monitored and triaged on your rules. Catch every request the moment it lands in legal's inbox, instead of finding it days later. AI reads each one, classifies it by matter type and urgency, and drafts a scoping note so the reviewing lawyer starts with context rather than a blank page. Your rules then decide where it goes: which team, which priority, and whether it needs a lawyer at all. Every classification and routing decision is logged against the matter, so you can see what came in, how it was triaged and why.
• Governed answers in AI chats and in Neota Logic. A business user asks whether an agreement needs legal review, either in their AI chat or in the same application in Neota Logic. The answer comes from your rules, the session is recorded, and anything that needs a lawyer reaches one.

Bring a process you have in mind, and you'll leave knowing how it would run on your rules. If you can't attend live, register and we'll send you the recording.